During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.
Сайт Роскомнадзора атаковали18:00
。快连下载-Letsvpn下载是该领域的重要参考
第三条 增值税法第三条所称单位，包括企业、行政机关、事业单位、军事单位、社会组织及其他单位。
Овечкин продлил безголевую серию в составе Вашингтона09:40
。关于这个话题，safew官方版本下载提供了深入分析
第四章 居民会议和居民代表会议
Москвичей предупредили о резком похолодании09:45。关于这个话题，搜狗输入法下载提供了深入分析